Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Request for Comments: 7385
Updates: 6514
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721

L. Andersson
Huawei Technologies
G. Swallow
Cisco Systems
October 2014

IANA Registry for P-Multicast Service Interface (PMSI)

Tunnel Type Code Points

Abstract

RFC 6514 created a space of Tunnel Type code points for a new BGP attribute called the "P-Multicast Service Interface Tunnel (PMSI Tunnel) attribute". However, the RFC did not create a corresponding IANA registry.

There now is need to make further code point allocations from this name space. This document serves to update RFC 6514 in that it creates an IANA registry for that purpose.

Status of This Memo

This is an Internet Standards Track document.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7385.

Copyright Notice

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     4.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     4.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4

1. Introduction

In 'BGP Encodings and Procedures for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP VPNs' [RFC6514], an optional transitive BGP attribute called the "P-Multicast Service Interface Tunnel (PMSI Tunnel) attribute" is specified. This BGP attribute uses an octet field to specify the PMSI tunnel type. RFC 6514 allocates the values 0-7.

There is now a need to make further code point allocations from this name space. In particular, "Inter-Area P2MP Segmented LSPs" [SEAMLESS-MCAST] needs to make such an allocation. However, the RFC did not create an IANA registry for these code points.

This document creates a new IANA registry called "P-Multicast Service Interface Tunnel (PMSI Tunnel) Tunnel Types" for these code points. The registry is created in the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Parameters" registry.

Creating this registry is an update of RFC 6514 [RFC6514].

2. Security Considerations

This document simply creates an IANA registry from a table in RFC 6514. Thus, there are no security concerns.

3. IANA Considerations

IANA has created a new registry called "P-Multicast Service Interface Tunnel (PMSI Tunnel) Tunnel Types" in the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Parameters" registry.

The allocation policy for values 0x00 to 0xFA is IETF Review [RFC5226]. Values 0xFB to 0xFE are experimental and are not to be assigned. 0xFF is reserved, the status of 0xFF may only be changed through Standards Action [RFC5226].

The initial registry should appear as:

      Value        Meaning                        Reference
      
      0x00         no tunnel information present  [RFC6514]
      0x01         RSVP-TE P2MP LSP               [RFC6514]
      0x02         mLDP P2MP LSP                  [RFC6514]
      0x03         PIM-SSM Tree                   [RFC6514]
      0x04         PIM-SM Tree                    [RFC6514]
      0x05         BIDIR-PIM Tree                 [RFC6514]
      0x06         Ingress Replication            [RFC6514]
      0x07         mLDP MP2MP LSP                 [RFC6514]
      0x08 - 0xFA  Unassigned
      0xFB - 0xFE  Experimental                   [RFC7385]
      0xFF         Reserved                       [RFC7385]

Figure 1

4. References

4.1. Normative References

   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              May 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>.
   
   [RFC6514]  Aggarwal, R., Rosen, E., Morin, T., and Y. Rekhter, "BGP
              Encodings and Procedures for Multicast in MPLS/BGP IP
              VPNs", RFC 6514, February 2012,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6514>.

4.2. Informative References

[SEAMLESS-MCAST]

              Rekhter, Y. and R. Aggarwal, "Inter-Area P2MP Segmented
              LSPs", Work in Progress, draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-
              mcast-14, July 2014.

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Adrian Farrel for unwavering support and our L3VPN, MPLS, and IDR co-chairs for swift processing of this document.

Authors' Addresses

Loa Andersson
Huawei Technologies

   EMail: loa@mail01.huawei.com

George Swallow
Cisco Systems

EMail:

          swallow@cisco.com